November 26, 2024-
Trump nominated Jay. I will not try to sabotage this. I hope that I have to issue a mea culpa in a few months.
Jay’s claim to fame is opposing the lockdowns. That, and his non-science background would make him qualified to run the CDC. However, he supported the deadly gene therapies until recently, and that is what the NIH did so wrong.
If he makes any effort at all to shout down Fauci’s bioweapons labs, I will be shocked. I hope he proves me wrong. But Greer knows. Greer always knows.
November 16, 2024- Opinion by Steven E. Greer, MD
As I predicted, Jayanta (“Jay”) Bhattacharya of Stanford is now a leading candidate to be the new Director of the Nation Institutes of Health (“NIH”), replacing disgraced Francis Collins (Tony Fauci worked under Collins). The NIH falls under the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and Bobby Kennedy has been tapped by Trump to be the new Sec. of HHS.
Coincidentally, I know Jay well. In January of this year, he joined my effort to publish the completed paper on mortality rates among COVID patents who were ventilated. The findings are too dangerous to publish. They show that New York Governor Cuomo and his government used ventilators as murder weapons in the early days of COVID. It was part of their overall euthanasia program that has resulted in the House referring Cuomo for criminal prosecution. I first had a divisional chair at Johns Hopkins helping me, but he got cold feet. I then submitted the paper to The Lancet where it was first accepted then rejected after government officials intervened (I had to sue The Lancet in federal court).
As part of that project, Jay and I spoke often. I had a hunch that Bobby Kennedy would end up as part of the Trump administration, which could open doors for Jay to be a senior government appointment because he is friends with Kennedy. I thought that the Director of the CDC would be a good fit because of Jay’s epidemiology background. Surprisingly, he thought he was qualified to be the Director of the NIH, even though he has no scientific research background. After medical school, Jay went on to study economics. I do not think he did a clinical residency. He became a medical bureaucrat studying Medicare spending, etc.
As our publication project stalled, it was clear that Jay was slow-walking it. I had seen that behavior before with Johns Hopkins. All he had to do was proofread my paper and look over the stats. He said he had reviewed the statistics and that they were good. However, months and months went by. Jay had excuses for not finishing his draft, such as “maybe I don’t write as fast as you do, Steve”, trying to butter me up.
It seems that it is not good for one’s academic career to publish a paper that shows how an entire state committed genocide of non-white people by cramming unnecessary ventilators down their throats and then putting them in a corner to not be cared for, even withholding water, assuring their deaths. Jay was clearly trying to avoid controversy ahead of the elections, angling to be kosher before a Senate confirmation hearing.
That is why I had to fire him. I got into a heated argument with Jay, told him all of the above, and removed him from the project. Brian Hooker of Children’s Health Defense (i.e., Bobby Kennedy’s non-profit) was a witness to it all, as was my lawyer.
Prior to me working with Jay, I was a critic of his, accusing him on social media of being a gutless medical bureaucrat for not speaking out against the Pfizer and Moderna gene therapies. During one Twitter exchange, Jay explicitly posted that he had no criticisms of the deadly products. Of course, he was not that stupid. He just did not have the courage to say anything.
Who is Jay Bhattacharya? His claim to fame is that he was one of the authors of The Great Declaration that was critical of the lockdowns. Fine, but that achieved nothing. It was nothing but a strongly worded letter. Now, the authors are trying to revise history and claim that it made a difference. They are already handing out the incestuous awards that medical bureaucrats give to each other. Jay was warded the Robert J. Zimmer Medal for Intellectual Freedom.
Jay’s other claim to fame is that he is a champion of free speech. He was chosen by an Attorney General to be one of the fake plaintiffs for Missouri v. Biden. They lost that case in the Supreme Court. But even if they had won, Jay had nothing to do with any of that. He was just a token chosen for name recognition to add gravitas to the suit, in my opinion, based on a discussion with the lead plaintiff and lawyers.
However, Jay is far from some free speech First Amendment advocate. He is a hypocrite. After I parted ways with him, he proceeded to block me on X.com. Normally, I would not care less about such an act. However, that is antithetical to Jay’s whole crusade against censorship. Blocking people for having dangerous conflicting views is exactly what the defendants in Missouri v. Biden are doing.
The NIH is a corrupt institution in need of reform. It is the money source for large portions of budgets in top universities. The “research” it funds, at best, achieves very few advances in medicine and surgery. At worst, the NIH grants promote harmful dogma, such as vaccines are safe, beta-amyloid plaque is the target for Alzheimer’s cures, and promotes unsafe Big Pharma drugs, such as antidepressants.
Then, of course, Tony Fauci and the military literally weaponized the NIH as part of their global bioweapons labs program. The NIH funded the Chinese Wuhan lab that created the SAR-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus. The NIH hijacked the medical peer-review process. The NIH smeared lifesaving drugs, such as ivermectin, because they got in the way of promoting their gene therapies (i.e., the Pfizer/Moderna “vaccines”).
The best person to run the NIH and cause real reform should not only have a medical science research background, but also have a vested interest in wanting to make reforms. They should have been harmed themselves by the vaccine, or have lost a job because Tony Fauci attacked them. None of that has happened to Jay Bhattacharya.
If I were to choose who should be the next NIH Director, it might be a spy agency insider who knows how to go after weaponized “research” that leads to deadly pandemics. Or, it could be someone like Marty Makary, MD. He is a real surgeon with clinical experience and was surprisingly vocal during the lockdowns. He was very critical of the CDC (I don’t know how he did that without getting fired). There are other similar candidates, but the last person on Earth I would choose would be a gutless, spineless, medical bureaucrat with no research experience and a proven track record of being unwilling to speak out against the deadly vaccines.
So, why is Jay a leading contender? He has been kissing up to Bobby Kennedy. For example, when Bobby announced his Vice President, no one well known wanted to be at the event because he is controversial. So, Jay was the main speaker that day.
Whomever is chosen to run the NIH will be Bobby Kennedy’s first big decision. If he chooses cronyism over competence, it will say a lot.